Search for: "MATTER OF G P"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
De plus, si l’on ne peut nier l’attrait du public pour la mode en général et les défilés de haute couture en particulier, on ne saurait dire que les requérants ont pris part à un débat d’intérêt général alors qu’ils se sont bornés à rendre des photographies de défilés de mode accessibles au public” [39]. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
(Univ. of Oxford, Research Paper, Working Paper No 23/2006), p. 7. [6] Id. [7] See G. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
[(Lusso, P. et al., Science 247:848-851 (1990)]. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 1:27 pm
I recently posted about the International Conference on “Realisation of Socio-Economic Rights in Emerging Free Markets: Perspectives from China and India” hosted by Centre for Chinese and Comparative Law (RCCL) of the School of Law of City University of Hong Kong, which took place on 29-30 November 2012. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus the disputed matter (Streitstoff) that is relevant for the appeal proceedings results from the SGA and the corresponding reply. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:54 am
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE TERMINATION OF THE PARENTAL RIGHTS TO: SMH, KDH, MJH, and APH, MINOR CHILDREN. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 8:48 am
., Jackson, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Board of County Commissioners, Teton County, Wyoming: Nicole G. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus the Board considers it to be necessary to examine whether the subject-matter of original claims 2 and 22 was indeed non unitary with the subject-matter of original claims 3, 20, 23, and 40, i.e. whether it was justified not to deal with the subject-matter of the latter in the international search report.[2.3.5] In the impugned decision the ED has endorsed the reasons for the finding of lack of unity provided by the ISA and referred [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
” Exxon Research & Eng’g Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
” Exxon Research & Eng’g Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
Broudy, Alexander G. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
§ 321(g)(1) (emphasis supplied). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:52 am
P. 26(g)(3), which requires that the court impose an appropriate sanction on the signer of discovery responses, the party on whose behalf the signer was acting, or both, there is at this point no requirement that counsel will be required to pay a part of the costs in this case. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:21 am
Broudy, Alexander G. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
Further undermining the meaning of any confidence intervals or p-values from the Jick study was the multiple testing and comparisons that took place within the Jick cohort. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm
For example, you won't see f+ao or r+uang or p+uo or zh+ie. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:54 pm
Gregory G. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:05 am
HARVEY G. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:07 am
The court stated that it was unable to ascertain whether the proceeds from the defendant’s book would be included under the terms of his parole, and it remanded the matter for investigation of the terms of the defendant’s parole. [read post]
