Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 1081 - 1100 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 5:09 pm
Holder Docket Filing | Questions Presented Case Number: 07-499 On Appeal From: USCA-5 Date Argued: November 5, 2008 Date Decided: March 3, 2009 8-1; Reversed and Remanded Majority: Kennedy(m), Roberts, Scalia(c), Souter, Ginsburg, Alito, Stevens(c), Breyer Dissent: Thomas(d) Days between argument and opinion: 118 (27) Summers v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:34 am by David Oscar Markus
Yes, there will be a great deal of changeYes, but only minor changesNothing significant will changeThere will be no change pollcode.com free pollsAnd we'd like to see what you think about Rumpole's discussion of Graham:Who got the better of the Graham argument re life for juvenilesJustice Kennedy's majority opinion was correct and its reasoning was persuasiveJustice Kennedy's opinion was correct but his reasoning was flawedJustice Thomas' dissent… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm by Sean Mirski
” Justice Kennedy found additional support for an exclusive power of recognition in “functional considerations. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:33 pm by Step Feldman
Four of the current Supreme Court justices can reasonably be characterized as displaying neoconservative tendencies (Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, and Alito). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by Kedar Bhatia
In OT08, Justice John Paul Stevens had an agreement rate below 50 percent with Justices Antonin Scalia, Thomas and Alito. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:15 am
Because she stays in the quorum until 2011, John Roberts does not become Chief Justice.* In December 2000, the Court consists of Scalia, Kennedy, Reagan's fourth appointment, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Clinton's third appointment, and Clinton's fourth appointment. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:40 am by Josh Blackman
On October 4, 1991, Senator Ted Kennedy cited the Legal Times story as a reason to vote against Thomas. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
” In a surprising twist, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion that expresses doubt as to whether ERISA’s preemption doctrine, at least with the breadth under which it has been applied, reflects a valid exercise of the powers of Congress under the Constitution. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Rich McHugh
” In a surprising twist, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion that expresses doubt as to whether ERISA’s preemption doctrine, at least with the breadth under which it has been applied, reflects a valid exercise of the powers of Congress under the Constitution. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:37 am by Bill Otis
  In Padilla (the case about advising clients about the immigration consequences of pleading guilty), Kennedy joined the left, Roberts and Alito articulated a middle ground standard, and only Scalia and Thomas would have found that the attorneys had no relevant obligation. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:26 pm by David Barron
 Which is why Reagan appointed Kennedy — he knew he passed the reverse litmus test on Roe . [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:56 pm by Schachtman
Even more curious is the willingness to the Times to castigate, on bogus legal grounds, Justice Thomas for responding to Justice Kennedy: “In a brief, sour retort that read more like a comment to a blog post, Justice Clarence Thomas quipped that however small Mr. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:02 pm
The opinion was delivered by Justice Kennedy and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Sotomayor. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm by Mark Walsh
” Breyer says that Justice Clarence Thomas has filed a “thorough” dissenting opinion, joined by Alito, Kagan and Gorsuch. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:55 am
Justice Stevens voted 16 times for the defendant, more than any other Justice, followed by Justice Souter (15), Justice Ginsburg (14), Justice Breyer (12), Justice Kennedy (7), Justice Scalia (6), Justice Roberts (4), Justice Thomas (4) and Justice Alito (3). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:48 am by JB
Rather, there are probably five votes for full incorporation under the Due Process Clause.The bottom line of the oral argument, not surprisingly, is that (excepting Justice Kennedy and possibly Justice Thomas) the Justices' substantive views on gun rights and abortion rights will determine the outcome of this case:Many of the Justices who support incorporation of the Second Amendment don't want to open the door to new implied fundamental rights, which they fear might be… [read post]