Search for: "Ray v. State" Results 1081 - 1100 of 1,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion by Judge Neil Gorsuch in Epic Systems v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:57 am by Ron Coleman
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am by Ron Coleman
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:58 am by Ron Coleman
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
25 Dec 2008, 11:56 am
Supreme Court decisions were summoned in support of this point, as well as the important recent ruling in Finstuen v. [read post]
Authors: Liz Hastilow, Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Steven Li, Liam Mackay and Mia Blundell. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 21, 2010 Ray v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
United States 54 USPQ2d 1519, 1530 (Ct. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Robert Liles
If a provider has determined that a subluxation is present based on an x-ray,[v] a Medicare contractor will likely take into consideration when the x-ray was taken and how much time has elapsed before a course of treatment was initiated. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:01 am by Anthony Lake
On Friday, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the highly-publicized tax evasion case against actor Wesley Snipes, U.S. v. [read post]