Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. and J. J."
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2017, 2:33 pm
“Almost all scientists have stated (or have been tempted to state) something like ‘the mean of Group A was greater than that of Group B, but the difference was not statistically significant’. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:41 am
Appx. 185, 187 (9th Cir. 2010) (Ikuta, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 12:16 pm
Judge Johnnie B. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm
November 26, 2012)(J. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
At para. 49, Rothstein J unequivocally stated that “there is only one standard of proof and that is proof on a balance of probabilities. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:25 pm
Kevin Kelly, entered into a construction and purchase contract with J&B Builders, for the purchase of a home to be built on two lots in a new subdivision in upstate New York. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:40 am
”The Court does describe three circumstances where the interests of justice outweigh finality. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
In that case the Court stated that ”…the assessment shall be based on the personal interests of the author, which are exercised by the claimants as his legal successors after his death; whereas possible own interests of the plaintiffs – i.e. interests not connected to the deceased and not inherited – are to be disregarded”, in essence giving precedent to the author’s intent rather than the personal gain of parties having power… [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
The trial court's decision, authored by Justice Bernard J. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm
J. of Int’l L. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:25 am
Attorney Mark J. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Radiol. 557 (2004); Thomas B. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
This willingness of states and other public organs to delegate is especially potent with respect to rules states are unwilling or incapable of adopting through traditional assertions of public authority. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:09 pm
The Strickland win certainly undermines the C.O.V. dangers of Oregon Robbery II (ORS 164.405(1)(b), and gives us a welcome boost attacking the robbery convictions of other states as well. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
SOTOMAYOR, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, in which KAGAN, J., joined. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
§ 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner states that the ’685 patent is the subject of several matters that may affect, or may be affected by a decision in this proceeding: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 7:53 pm
The applicable test for common law public interest immunity Having held that common law public interest immunity remains part of Singapore law, Jeyaretnam JC went on to consider the applicable test for common law public interest immunity and the requirements for invoking common law public interest immunity, holding that: whether public interest immunity can be invoked involves a balancing exercise as to whether the public interest against… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Joshua B. [read post]
