Search for: "State v. Woods"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 2,998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 12:45 pm
On April 4, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Woods v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am
Imposing a "disciplinary probation period" as part of the penalty or settlement of a disciplinary actionWoods v State Univ. of N.Y., 2016 NY Slip Op 04084, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe genesis of Woods v State University of New York [SUNY], was Norman Woods being served with a notice of discipline issued in accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement [CBA] negotiated by State and… [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
— Michigan v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:35 am
Tree work is among the most dangerous occupations in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:35 am
Tree work is among the most dangerous occupations in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:54 am
Foster, May 12, 2016, Woods, G.). [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm
The PATA states that New York law governs the interpretation of its terms, J.A. 219, and under that law we review the District Court’s interpretation of the PATA de novo, Dreisinger v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:59 am
Expert commentary on the decision is also included below (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Hemopet v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm
” Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm
” Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Ms Wood also criticised the cost of privacy orders as she says that only the wealthy can afford protection. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:10 pm
Even a perceptive journalist like Zoe Williams was confused, not able to see the wood for the trees in such a long judgment. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:06 am
Touzot v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Dialogue, 27 U.S. 1 (1829) United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 3:48 am
Temple University (2008) and Saxe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
Ryll v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm
” Clapper v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm
” Clapper v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
