Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1081 - 1100
of 4,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
Justice O’Connor’s formulations in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Twitter and Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:47 pm
(Afsaw v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c disability benefitsGamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14In Gamma, the Appellate Division concluded that an agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law can set out the controlling procedures for resolving disputes concerning Section 207-c benefits, including resolving any dispute concerning light duty assignments and the continuation of such benefits through arbitration.City of Newburgh police officer Stephen J. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:14 pm
Winter v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:48 am
This was the issue in a 1976, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, Colonial Savings Association v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 10:47 am
Taylor's patent upon receipt of payment of all outstanding maintenance fees.Taylor v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:44 pm
For further details, please see the Reed Smith Client Alert by Andrew Taylor and Alexandra Allan. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Updating yesterday's ILB report on the Supreme Court's decison in Ronnie Drane v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
This longstanding practice has been presumed lawful until recently,1 when the Sixth Circuit issued a misguided decision—Taylor v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Employee contributions by a member of a public retirement system as “disposable income” for the purposes of filing for bankruptcyNYC Employees' Retirement System v Sapir, CA2,243 F.3d 124* Sharlene De Ann Taylor, an employee of the New York City Housing Authority [NYCHA], filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in accordance with 11 U.S.C. 1325(b). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
Taylor, 136 S. [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job.In contrast, in Outley v Upstate Med. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.* Matter of the Arbitration between Professional, Clerical, Technical… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:21 am
Relying on Holodook v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:08 am
See Quinn v. [read post]
Marmet Health Care Center v. Brown: FAA Preempts Rule Prohibiting Arbitration of Nursing Home Claims
12 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
In Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 12:26 am
Perhaps the leading case illustrating this principle is Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
