Search for: "L & G Productions" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm
§ 1337(l) to become ineffective while ignoring Congress's clear intent. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
Railroad Friction Products. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
” The following three federal MDLs all involved pharmaceutical products, well-respected federal judges, and a fundamental error in statistical inference. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Lara
 Relax-a-cizor Products, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Selon le paragraphe 6(2) de la Loi, l’emploi d’une marque de commerce crée de la confusion avec une autre marque de commerce lorsque l’emploi des deux marques dans la même région ferait conclure que les marchandises liées à ces marques sont fabriquées, vendues, données à bail ou louées, ou que les services liés à ces marques sont loués ou exécutés, par la même… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:45 pm by My name
  The final form of the product or service to be marketed may be different from the first invention, and protecting the patent right would require a series of intermediary filings to protect the priority.[12]  Each additional filing imposes additional costs on the inventor. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:40 am by D. Daxton White
FFA Specialty FFA Franklin Select Realty Trust FSN Diversified FSN G & L Realty Corp GLR Office GLR Gables Residential Trust GBP Apartments GBP General Growth Properties GGP RetailMalls GGP Glenborough Realty Trust GLB Diversified GLB Glimcher Realty Trust GRT RetailMixed GRT Golf Trust of America GTA Specialty GTA Great Lakes REIT, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the initial silicate concentration […] according to claim 6 of the patent is limited to “at most 15 g/l” whereas the independent process claim 1 of the application as filed only requires a value “less than 20 g/l”. [2.2] In application of the principle restated in T 925/98 [2] the Board considers that a limiting amendment consisting in a replacement of the upper limit “less than 20 g/l” of said… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
A broader look at Strasbourg jurisprudence reveals that the Court recognises that this watchdog role is not unique to the press, with the court stating in Társaság A Szabadságjogokért v Hungary (Application no. 37374/05) 14 April 2009, “The function of the press includes the creation of forums for public debate. [read post]