Search for: "STATE v. LAWRENCE"
Results 1101 - 1120
of 3,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:23 pm
Judge Lawrence noted how common settlement negotiations are in the lower District, and also encouraged state appellate attorneys to cross over into the federal arena more often, especially since the federal courts use case management plans that state appellate level does not. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
In Grutter v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
” Other coverage of the denial in the Wisconsin case comes from Lawrence Hurley of Reuters. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
In California v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 3:38 pm
In Nusbaum v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am
Most prominently, in Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Debate on last week’s oral arguments in McCutcheon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:08 am
That was the issue in Danduran Jr. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:14 am
” At Coats and Bennett, James Lawrence discusses the Solicitor General’s recommendation that cert. be denied in Athena Cosmetics v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:10 pm
The state was prosecuting a dead body. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:01 pm
In the wake of the Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:46 am
Before Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:50 pm
" The court could have responded to this argument by pointing out that the since Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:13 pm
LEXIS 23791 (9th Cir. 2011) (affirming United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:20 pm
In Maples v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
It is styled, Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. [read post]
