Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 1101 - 1120 of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2013, 6:33 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “No person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 10:35 am by Rubric Legal LLC
The Specifics of the Original Case The underlying case, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
Minnesota, 14-1470, and Beylund v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm by Andrew Brasher
Perry, but to strike down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
There are some extremely fact specific distinctions based on a case out of Minnesota (Christey v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:23 am by Julia Malleck
North Country (2005) North Country chronicles the story of the first class-action sexual harassment lawsuit in the United States, Jenson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Jackson, Mississippi attorney Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/13/14: Hobby Lobby Implementation; Jumping the Gun on a Final Rule; Extended Waters of the United States; and EPA Rules to Watch – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm by Emily Coward
If you were summoned for jury duty for the case of State of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am by Steve Baird
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  I thought it useful to cover these issues in a short but distinct section after house searches, with United States v. [read post]