Search for: "DOE V US"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 96,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2004, 3:53 am
In Hibbs v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:34 am
In the case of Dayton v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 7:06 pm
**In passing, from http://sloanconsortium.org/node/228146As noted in Campbell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
Ruggers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 11:27 am
The question in Hana Financial v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
Purzel Video GmbH v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:27 am
The Thompsons Film, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:55 am
If PUREOATY brings OATLY to mind, does this not create an unfair advantage? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
The copy may well be cheaper but that also does not increase choice of price. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
LP. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:04 am
In Matter of Marino v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:04 am
In Matter of Marino v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 pm
’” (Quoting NXIVM Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:29 pm
The fight for fair use heads to the Supreme Court in Lenz v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:13 am
” KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:03 pm
RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Guidelines used to determine if an entity is a “public body that is performing a governmental function” for the purposes of the Open Meetings LawThomas, et al. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 06989, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [DOE] appealed an order and judgment handed down by Supreme Court, New York County, granting a petition filed by Michael P. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
That Court, agreeing with other Courts in Texas and around the country, held that Padilla does not apply new rule of criminal procedure but is an extension of the rule in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:29 pm
A company think that the Air Force is wrongfully using some of its trade secrets, but the Air Force says it has a contractual right to do so. [read post]