Search for: "In re Render" Results 1121 - 1140 of 9,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2017, 3:34 am
In re Caleb Suresh Motupalli, Serial No. 86573858 (October 2, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 8:22 am
Inadmissibility – CMTs can render individuals inadmissible to the United States, meaning they may be denied entry or re-entry into the country. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 11:50 am by Florian Mueller
The discrepancies between the ITC's findings (which are final except for only one patent that Apple has already worked around anyway) and the verdict rendered by Qualcomm's hometown jury without a great deal of deliberation time could hardly be more extreme. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Arbitrator mistakenly believed that his role was to render a decision that aided and supported the employee's re-integration into the community rather than fairly and objectively decide an employer-employee dispute. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 3:48 am
" The Board concluded that "overall, Applicant's mark creates the commercial impression of being a rough or rudimentary depiction or imitation of Registrant's more realistically rendered mark. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:25 am
"... that he actually holds views—about Donald Trump, say, or the importance of vaccines—that would render him beyond the pale.... [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:46 pm
If you're interested, here's a clip (I start at about 2:15). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
That is, applicant's consulting services feature practices that render neutral the impact of runoff of stormwater. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:02 am
In re Zuma Array Limited, 2020 USPQ2d 736 (TTAB 2022) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
In re High Caliper Growing, Inc., Serial No. 86589047 (August 30, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 7:23 am
  In addition, contracts “should be read to give effect to all its provisions and not to render any part of it ineffective. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Circuit Court of Appeals said in Segal v NYC Department of Education, 459 F3d 207, the placement of an individual’s name on the New York City Department of Education’s “Ineligible/Inquiry List” essentially render the individual ineligible for future employment with the New York City Department of Education [DOE].* In this Article 78 action Supreme Court denied a former tenured teacher’s [Teacher] petition seeking to, among other things, remove her name from an… [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
Employees must be paid overtime, unless they're exempt for some reason, while independent contractors are not covered by overtime laws or workers compensation laws and a variety of other laws covering employees. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The panel avoids this resultby severing the Title 5 removal provisions as applied toAPJs, and thereby “render[ing] the APJs inferior officersand remedy[ing] the constitutional appointment problem. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 6:01 am
You have to show that either the disease or a complication of the disease has rendered you unable to continue working. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:47 am
In re Peter Wood, Geoffrey Dean-Smith, and Tasha Mudd, Serial No. 87022288 (October 25, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Arbitrator mistakenly believed that his role was to render a decision that aided and supported the employee's re-integration into the community rather than fairly and objectively decide an employer-employee dispute. [read post]