Search for: "Matter of Advisory Opinion" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 7:55 am by Bob Ambrogi
Buss was a founding member and former president of the Chicago Area Docket Association and active member of the NDA and was former chairperson of the eCourts Advisory Committee for the Circuit Court of Cook County. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 12:39 am by JR Chaves
Si hay una inminente fuente de litigios contencioso-administrativos, esa es la responsabilidad patrimonial derivada de la asistencia sanitaria. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
  The Advisory Committee Notes explain that the various techniques of discovery kick in by virtue of Rule 26(b), where automatic disclosure and report requirements of Rule 26(a) leave off: “Rules 26(b)(4)(B) and (C) do not impede discovery about the opinions to be offered by the expert or the development, foundation, or basis of those opinions. [read post]
As discussed in a recent client alert, a Delaware court issued a significant opinion in a directors and officers liability claim involving a special purpose acquisition company. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
 You might be of the opinion that Amazon could fall into this category. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
  I can't agree, and before today's opinion, I don't think I'd ever read any other case in which a substantive portion of a criminal statute was held be be essentially purely advisory and not an actual element. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
He wrote, “In the matter at hand, however, there exists no factual basis for the Board to engage in emergency rulemaking. [read post]
” According to Roberts, the majority’s ruling conflicted with the proscription against federal courts giving advisory opinions. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Ronald M. Levin
As a factual matter, invalidation of the guidelines would remove their influence. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:51 am by Schachtman
The trial court does not necessarily endorse the opinions proffered, but should the court give its imprimatur to the witnesses’ standing as having opinions that could be considered, relied upon to the exclusion of competing opinions, and form the basis for verdicts for the parties offering these suspect witnesses? [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:20 pm by Kristine Palkowetz
and (2) Can I continue posting about unrelated matters not pertaining to my case or injuries? [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The Illinois Supreme Court adopted the control group test that has been applied in the federal system, and further explained the qualifications of a control group member, finding that “an employee whose advisory role to top management in a particular area is such that a decision would not normally be made without his advice or opinion, and whose opinion in fact forms the basis of any final decision by those without actual authority, is properly within the control… [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am by Samuel Bray
Its reasoning may well suggest as much, but to pronounce a holding on that point seems to me no more than an advisory opinion–which a federal court should never issue at all, see Hayburn's Case, 2 Dall. 409 (1792), and especially should not issue with regard to a constitutional question, as to which we seek to avoid even nonadvisory opinions, see, e.g. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The Illinois Supreme Court adopted the control group test that has been applied in the federal system, and further explained the qualifications of a control group member, finding that “an employee whose advisory role to top management in a particular area is such that a decision would not normally be made without his advice or opinion, and whose opinion in fact forms the basis of any final decision by those without actual authority, is properly within the control… [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 9:17 pm by Josh Blackman
Third, given that the Court denied the application, any discussion of the merits would be an advisory opinion. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:25 am by Catherine Amirfar
” The ICJ has previously applied these duties of non-recognition and non-assistance in relation to illegal occupations in both the Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia Advisory Opinion and in the Construction of a Wall Advisory Opinion. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by Aaron
In his dissent, Judge Korman argued that this appeal, no matter how decided, would have no practical consequence, as Mr. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
And what does it matter if the defendant’s conduct matched the predicate crime regardless of the technical details of the conviction? [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:45 am by Public Employment Law Press
A court’s review of a decision of the Commissioner of Human Rights is not whether the court would have reached the same result but was the Commissioner's determination rational in light of the evidence presented  A court's review of a college’s or university’s disciplinary action against a student limited to whether it complied with its own rules in the process  A public school district is not an "education corporation or association" within the… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
So while the state and Glossip are at odds over an important matter, they are not at odds on anything in this case. [read post]