Search for: "P&P IMPORTS, INC." Results 1121 - 1140 of 3,313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
The cases are not necessarily listed in order of importance (whatever that means). [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See T-MOBILE USA, INC. v.Huawei Device USA, Inc., 115 F.Supp.3d 1184 (2015) (DTSA/UTSA case).Example 2. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
See T-MOBILE USA, INC. v.Huawei Device USA, Inc., 115 F.Supp.3d 1184 (2015) (DTSA/UTSA case).Example 2. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, as important as the U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am by Larry
Continuing my effort to catch up on 2017 customs decision from the Court of International Trade, we come to Kalle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 7:08 pm by Ben Vernia
In another important case, drug manufacturer Mylan Inc. paid approximately $465 million to resolve allegations that it underpaid rebates owed under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program by erroneously classifying its patented, brand name drug EpiPen – which has no therapeutic equivalents or generic competition – as a generic drug to avoid its obligation to pay higher rebates. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
But despite this, Philadelphia seems to be trying to restrict one important form of defending life and liberty (and protecting property): bulletproof barriers that help shield employees from robbers or other attackers. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 2:40 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
TevaParenteral Medicines, Inc., 845 F.3d 1357 (Fed. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Co., 37 U.S.P.Q. 156 (Comm'r Pat. 1938) (QUEEN MARY for women's underwear); Ex Parte Summit Brass & Bronze Works, Inc., 59 U.S.P.Q. 22 (Comm'r Pat. 1943)(AGNUS DEI for safes); In re P. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Par leur demande en nullité dirigée contre la procureure générale du Québec, défenderesse, et Uber Canada inc., mise en cause, les demandeurs cherchent l’annulation de l’entente de principe et du projet pilote mis en place à l’automne 2016 par le ministre des Transports, de la Mobilité durable et de l’Électrification des transports en faveur de la mise en cause au motif qu’ils contreviennent… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]