Search for: "In re I.S." Results 1141 - 1160 of 13,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 8:00 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The analogy being used behind the scenes is that APD can repair the plane (i.e., the academy) while they're flying it. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 3:34 am
The Examining Attorney based the refusal on the connection between the mark and the nature of the means through which the goods are sold (i.e., wholesale). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 2:20 am
"Here, and unlike in In re Les Halles, the services are to be provided in the place named. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:59 am
 It’s never too soon to start planning so you don’t leave loved ones wondering what your wishes were when you’re gone. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 11:54 am by Jacob Wirz
  While other justices consider the MQD to be a substantive canon (i.e., a canon of statutory interpretation that promotes a policy norm existing external to a statute), Justice Barrett indicated that she understands the MQD to be a linguistic canon (i.e., a canon of interpretation that applies grammatical rules or speech patterns to discern a statute’s meaning). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Newman in dissent from the denial of the petition for re-hearing in Kimberly-Clark v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:21 pm
Last Wednesday the feds indicted Pennsylvania Superior Court (i.e., appellate court) Judge Michael T. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:39 am by Jessica Rich
In short, whether you’re an online marketplace or a third party seller, it would be wise to bone up on INFORM’s requirements before the effective date, and make sure you’re ready to implement them when the magic date arrives. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:12 am by Anastasia de Waal
It’s now even more important to ensure that they’re genuinely effective – and bringing them immediately under FOI is imperative to doing so. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:15 am by Elie Mystal
Re: “Is health-care reform constitutional? [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:07 pm
  The patent application has claims to what can only be described as a method of doing business when your business is patent trolling, i.e., getting rights to a patent and asserting it against infringers. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:08 am by John Floyd
They can compile a significant amount of evidence, as they did in the Carey case, before they have to say, “hold it, we’re investigating this and they’re talking about that. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am by John P. Feldman and Courtney E. Fisher
That said, we’re not convinced that this recent decision is reliable enough to conclude that “revolutionary” or “breakthrough” claims never require substantiation as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:08 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The re-hearing and re-writing of the Kennedy opinion was a good thing; we want the Supreme Court's opinions to be based on accurate facts and solid legal reasoning. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the Southern District of New York described how the Rule 68 Offer of Judgment may be used by employers to pay—i.e., “pick off”—individual plaintiffs to defeat a broader and significantly more costly FLSA collective action in his recent opinion in Anjum v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:22 pm by Alex Craigie
The upshot, I guess, is that, if you’re interested at all in what jurors watch, it’s not because you’re worried their views have been shaped by those shows, but because what they watch may reflect how deeply they hold certain beliefs in the first place. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:56 am by The Namby Pamby
Clerk: I need you to re-sign the back of your credit card to match the signature on your driver’s license.Me: Are you joking? [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 5:24 am by SHG
” The report makes clear that this refers to individual people, rather than cases (i.e. people with many cases are not being counted multiple times). [read post]