Search for: "Secretary, Department of Corrections" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 6:11 am by HR Hero
“I think the authority of the secretary to address this is a separate issue from what the correct amount is,” he said. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:52 am by Jimmy Chalk, Sarah Grant
Please email Sarah Grant with breaking news, relevant documents, or corrections. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:42 pm by Kate McGovern Tornone
“I think the authority of the secretary to address this is a separate issue from what the correct amount is and the litigation needs to be considered carefully both with respect to what would be the appropriate amount if the rule were to be changed or revised but also what is within the authority of the secretary to do,” he told lawmakers last month. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
However, the District Court emphasized that in issuing this decision, it had the power to correct only errors of fact, not errors of law. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Silverman served as Special Counsel to the Commissioner for Ethics, Risk and Compliance at the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:21 am by Emma Boffey and Lorraine Walkinshaw
The appeals On this occasion, the three cases, to be heard over the four days, are all Scottish appeals: Monday 12 June, 11am – 4pmSadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department This appeal relates to the evidential burden on the state when disrupting ‘sham marriages’. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
 “His mistake was in overstating the extent to which those who drafted and ratified the Constitution held government securities at the time of their actions, as opposed to having purchased them by the time of Secretary of the Treasury Hamilton’s funding operation, beginning in 1790. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
So, Putin is correct, he can say that he’s not influencing anything because he’s just putting out his stance. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 1:10 pm by Andrew Kent
Prosecutors at the Department of Justice are the ones who decide. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Namely, that cybersecurity issues continue to shift away from the IT department, not only ranking among the most important issues facing any enterprise, its management and board – but now also falling squarely under the purview and oversight of its legal department. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
“I think the authority of the secretary to address this is a separate issue from what the correct amount is,” he said. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The new administration can correct this oversight. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
There is a good argument that this position is the legally correct one. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:11 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
And I mention that because I think the authority of the secretary to address this is a separate issue from what the correct amount is and the litigation needs to be considered carefully [not only] with respect to what would be the appropriate amount if the rule were to be changed or revised but also [with respect to] what is within the authority of the secretary to do. [read post]