Search for: "Delay v. Texas" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2019, 7:30 am by John McFarland
The closest analogy to Newfield’s case in Texas of which I’m aware is Yturria v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in a case in 1998, styled "State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Department of Defense) Recent Stories on Constitution Daily Justice Gorsuch joins the court - again President acts to keep immigration order alive Podcast: Loving v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am by John Floyd
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
The BLT/Law.com has, "Justices Delay Execution, May Examine DNA Testing Issue," posted by Marcia Coyle.The Supreme Court’s “11th hour” stay of execution issued last evening for a Texas death row inmate may give the justices another chance to revisit a key DNA testing question left unanswered last term.The justices unanimously granted the delay one hour before Henry Skinner was scheduled to die for the 1993 murders of his girlfriend and her… [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 4:07 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (case no. 2:05-CV-339); no reasoning provided within the opinionPOSTX Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Texas is also on the court’s capital docket. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Sanctions ruling from Chief Judge Folsom - $100,000 for failure to timely disclose a crucial document: ESN, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Sanctions ruling from Chief Judge Folsom - $100,000 for failure to timely disclose a crucial document: ESN, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am by Joe Mullin
DataTern lawyers, meanwhile, claim the lawyers "agreed to agree on a contingent fee arrangement," or a hybrid hourly/contingent model, but that the lawyers delayed drawing up an agreement spelling that out "so they could continue to overwork the case" and charge "enormous, unreasonable hourly fees. [read post]