Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. United States" Results 1161 - 1180 of 3,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In April 2010, the Institute of Medicine urged the FDA to regulate the amount of salt that food manufacturers use in their products; New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg convinced 16 companies to do so voluntarily, with the threat of government regulation in the background.However, recent science does not support the common assumption about salt. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
He noted that though the business community (along with NGOs and local governments) were excluded from the Paris negotiation these GHG programs might prove a good means creating robust governance beyond the state but in conjunction with states. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
Homeopathic medicine was heralded upon its entry into the United States in 1835, primarily because –unlike traditional medicine of the time – it didn’t kill patients (like mercury tinctures) and wasn’t gross (like leaching). [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
 Mylan asks: “Whether the mere filing of an abbreviated new drug application by a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer is sufficient to subject the manufacturer to specific personal jurisdiction in any state where it might someday market the drug. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:09 pm by John Stigi
Defendants were the CEO and CFO of the now-defunct Basin Water, Inc., a company that manufactured water treatment units to provide municipalities with clean drinking water. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  The reason the company did this was so they could destroy them leaving their bus manufacturing business with little competition in terms of public transportation options, and most trolley lines were replaced with bus lines. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 8:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  The reason the company did this was so they could destroy them leaving their bus manufacturing business with little competition in terms of public transportation options, and most trolley lines were replaced with bus lines. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:29 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2014, Asetek sent AVC a letter accusing the company of infringing — however the letter mistakenly accuesd AVC of manufacturing the Liqmax 120s (it does not). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:00 am by Garrett D. Trego
Aug. 22, 2016), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the motion, but allowed the municipalities to amend their complaints as to their nuisance causes of action. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Along with their direct employer, they sued Allied Van Lines (which had an agency relationship with the moving company) and its parent company (Griffin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm by Michael Grossman
While Janssen Pharmaceutical and Johnson & Johnson can be held liable for the damages caused by Risperdal and Invega, a 2011 decision by the United States Supreme Court protects most makers of generic risperidone/paloperidone from litigation. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 2:45 pm by Michael Grossman
It ranks 17th among the top 20 chemicals produced in the United States, according to the federal government. [read post]