Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am
Briggs, “Use The Wrong P-value, Go To Jail: Not A Joke: Updated With Amicus Brief,” Statistician to the Stars (Oct. 1, 2013). 2 United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
The clamor from day-to-day White House activity dominates the news media’s attention, but in the meantime, the Trump administration has quietly been moving forward to fill the judicial vacancies. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:14 am
This housing v. public accommodation difference isn’t always perfectly obvious. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Brainchild: Loving v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
People in Glass Houses . . . [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 11:08 am
In People v Eubanks, the defendant caused a fatal accident. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:01 am
The high threshold of Wednesbury unreasonableness (Wednesbury Corporation and Others v Ministry of Housing and Local Government (No 2) [1965] 3 All ER 571) is being rigorously applied. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
Cranesville Aggregate Companies, Inc., December 18, 2017, Hall, P.). [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
., married-student housing at a religious college) would better be viewed not as implicating compelled speech, but instead, as David Cole suggested at argument, as raising the question whether the Court would, or might, craft additional exceptions to the general free exercise doctrine of Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
, at p. 415. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 5:56 am
By Joy P. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 11:23 am
Sanzaro v. [read post]
