Search for: "Application of United Mineral Products Company"
Results 101 - 120
of 197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 10:00 pm
“Companies must take extra care with a product fed to the most vulnerable among us. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:24 am
The firm has eight offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
Google Knew Throughout That it Needed a License to Use the Copyrighted Materials2.1 Rubin agreement (as CEO of Danger, his previous company) with Sun of October 19, 20 [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Morgan, the following text is curious:By 1897, General Electric was the undisputed leader, and Westinghouse was its only serious rival. n152 The two companies agreed to a truce in the form of patent cross-licensing and product pricing agreements. n153 Smaller competitors were invited to join [*1931] the Incandescent Lamp Manufacturers Association, organized by General Electric. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 8:38 am
Among the more interesting: (1) the insistence on the fiction that state owned enterprises ought to be treated as autonomous of its state owners; (3) the willingness to extend the principle of extraterritoriality through the privatization of European rules enforced within production chain apex corporations without regard to conflicts with the domestic legal orders of host states where this privatized European private law will be implemented; (3) a determination to use extraterritoriality… [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:38 am
This strengthens the case for the application of international law and governance norms as a basis on which investors ought to evaluate their investment decisions. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
While asbestos is a naturally occurring element that humans have used for thousands of years, due to its remarkable ability to resist fire, heat, electricity, and caustic chemicals, it wasn’t until the industrial revolution in Western Europe and the United States that it was heavily mined and used in virtually every aspect of production and construction. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 7:38 am
Vaquillas Unproven Minerals, Ltd., 2015 WL 4638272 (Tex.Ct.App. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:21 pm
A Texas appeals court recently ruled in ConocoPhillips Company v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:21 pm
A Texas appeals court recently ruled in ConocoPhillips Company v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
In the EM MNE paper, I examined whether the standards promoted as international standards applicable to Canadian extractive companies operating internationally were standards that an EM MNE home state might similarly view as internationally relevant to EM MNEs. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:29 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently decided the case of Breton Energy, L.L.C., et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
” According to GRC, asbestos was a raw mineral, while asbestos-containing products were...well, products. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
<> Studying the air above oil and gas production areas in the western United States - NOAA and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) researchers and their colleagues are studying what escapes to the air—and how it is transformed in the atmosphere and affects air quality and climate. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
After six years of work, the United Nations Human Rights Council approved his Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
The approach was rebuffed, and United Kingdom takeover rules—both companies have London listings—forbid Glencore from making any further overtures for the following six months. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
If NAM is reversed, companies whose products contain conflict minerals would be required to bear the costs associated with tracing the origin of minerals in their products in order to determine their country of origin. [read post]
