Search for: "BURROUGHS v. BURROUGHS" Results 101 - 120 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 9:58 pm
Sperry, merging with Burroughs to form Unisys, forgot that it owned the LZW patent until 1994. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 This rule was first adopted in Tennessee in the 1915 decision of Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
From the Blogs – Week ending July 16, 2016[Internet links highlighted in color] Posted by JustiaPrew v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am by Terry Hart
As DC has done with the Batmobile and other Batman characters, it is common practice to license characters for use in new works.17See, e.g., Burroughs v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm by Camilla Hrdy
Lens. com, Inc., 722 F. 3d 1229, 1248-49 (10th Cir. 2013) (discussing survey findings on the low end).For example, in James Burrough Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The court found that there were sufficient differences between the original books, which traced from 1912, and the many successive Tarzan movies beginning in 1918 with Elmo Lincoln starring, and that the studio was a grantee of title to the character (Burroughs v. [read post]