Search for: "Body v. McDonald"
Results 101 - 120
of 220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Following Montgomery v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Following Montgomery v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
(Andrews, which struck down a ban on handgun carrying, was cited in Heller and McDonald. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Second Amendment may invalidate ban on opening new gun stores in a California county
16 May 2016, 9:18 am
” McDonald v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
The question of ‘horizontal effect’ of the convention – the obligations on the Court as public body – will also be explored in the Supreme Court decision in McDonald v McDonald, (an English case on Art 8 and s.21 possession claims) which is awaited… Meanwhile, in other things that make you wonder ‘why on earth would you do that? [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm
The court first held that the Human Rights defence could not stand against a private body, given McDonald v McDonald [2014] EWCA Civ 1049.In any event, possession would be proportionate, given the general legitimacy of being able to enforce security. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
By creating a feeble version of intermediate scrutiny for the Second Amendment, the 2nd Circuit chose to ignore the Supreme Court’s teaching in in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
Governing bodies of those institutions may designate limited portions of a campus as off-limits. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
Spam at McDonald's. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
McDonald gets some relief. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
” McDonald v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
That is the right that the Court said applied all across the country, in the 2010 decision in McDonald v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
Sathe, while noting that the ‘high legitimacy of the [Indian] Supreme Court’ arises from its appearance as ‘a body aloof from politics’, acknowledged that several judges with prior parliamentary or ministerial experience (including V. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Thus, "banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep' and use for protection of one's home and family,' [ Parker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Clark v Jeter, 486 US 456, 461 (1988). [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd [2015] UKSC 15 When the Court of Appeal held that a disability discrimination defence to possession under Equality Act 2010 had to face the same ‘seriously arguable’ summary test as an Article 8 defence, we were surprised, and very unimpressed. [read post]
