Search for: "Brennan v. CIR"
Results 101 - 120
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Apple Inc., No. 13-2227 (2d Cir. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:40 am
Brennan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[15] Two years later, in Bigelow v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm
Calderon, 151 F.3d 970, 984 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:57 pm
See generally Smith v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:29 am
Peterson (2d Cir. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:37 am
CIA, 586 F.3d 171, 186 (2d Cir. 2009), statements made by unidentified sources do not constitute official disclosures). [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
United States, 479 F.3d 296, 300 (4th Cir. 2007); Ann E. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
Discovery Rule, Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling, and "Equitable" Tolling Cannot Save Aredia-Zometa Case
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In Jolly v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:12 am
Brennan, 417 U.S. 188, 196–97, 94 S.Ct. 2223, 41 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Brennan, “Can Epidemiologists Give Us Some Specific Advice? [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:14 pm
Rendon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Our government, in speeches given by the Attorney General,[2] John Brennan,[3] Harold Koh,[4] and myself,[5] makes official disclosures of large amounts of information about its efforts, and the legal basis for those efforts, but it is never enough, because the public doesn’t know what it doesn’t know, but knows there are things their government is still withholding from them. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F. 3d 171, 178 (6th Cir 2009); Westberry v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:43 pm
Marks v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioner Hillman v. [read post]
