Search for: "Brown v. Phillips"
Results 101 - 120
of 367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Phillips v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
The key legal questions facing Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr are likely to concern the interpretation of: (1) The Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; (2) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency; and (3) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
It is for Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr to determine whether there is an automatic right to appeal. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown and Mance dismissed it on the basis that even if information was held only partly for the purposes of journalism, art or literature, it remained outside the scope of FOIA. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:48 am
Hilary Term begins in the Privy Council on Thursday 12 January 2012 with the one day hearing in front of Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr and Wilson of Rukhmin Balgobin v South West Regional Health Authority, which is on appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:00 am
TEX.R.CIV.P. 94; Phillips v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
Lord Brown agreed with this approach [111]. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
On Thursday 28 July 2011, Lord Phillips, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case Ministry of Defence v AB and others. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
By Michael Kiely & Phillip Tate In his budget submitted on January 10, 2011, one week after taking office, Governor Jerry Brown proposes to slash $12 billion in State spending in a wide array of areas, including, welfare, health services and higher education. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:37 pm
Browning Mfg. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
Following the High Court decision that the maximum time that a person can be held in police detention is 96 hours, including time spent on police bail (unless there is new evidence justifying further arrest), and the Government plan to introduce emergency legislation to reverse the decision, the Supreme Court has issued the following ruling: “On 30 June 2011 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom granted permission to appeal in this case and the appeal will be heard on 25 July by Lords… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
The appeal was heard and will be considered by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
It’s also a busy week in the Privy Council – on Monday 31 October Saint Aubin Limitee v Alain Jean Francois Doger de Speville (Mauritius) will be heard over one day by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
Lord Brown agreed with this approach [111]. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:44 am
Kevin Brown
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:40 am
Cate decided last Monday and Michael Angelo Morales and Albert Greenwood Brown v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Katz, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Palo Alto, CA Right now we’re in a complete mess; nobody knows what the law is. [read post]
