Search for: "Burroughs v. Burroughs"
Results 101 - 120
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
ShareIn 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:58 pm
Sperry, merging with Burroughs to form Unisys, forgot that it owned the LZW patent until 1994. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
Dimengo, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, for Appellant Cincinnati Reds Kody R. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
This rule was first adopted in Tennessee in the 1915 decision of Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
From the Blogs – Week ending July 16, 2016[Internet links highlighted in color] Posted by JustiaPrew v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc v OHIM (R708/2006-4). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:06 am
Schaad v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
As DC has done with the Batmobile and other Batman characters, it is common practice to license characters for use in new works.17See, e.g., Burroughs v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am
Burroughs?) [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
SanDiskCorp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
Burroughs involved bugging of a hotel room by private parties. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:29 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co., 74 N.C. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
Lens. com, Inc., 722 F. 3d 1229, 1248-49 (10th Cir. 2013) (discussing survey findings on the low end).For example, in James Burrough Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:24 am
Slip Op. citing Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
Solvay v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
The court found that there were sufficient differences between the original books, which traced from 1912, and the many successive Tarzan movies beginning in 1918 with Elmo Lincoln starring, and that the studio was a grantee of title to the character (Burroughs v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:36 am
Burroughs, 613 F.3d 233 (D.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:24 am
Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:13 pm
” Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:47 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]