Search for: "Burrows v State" Results 101 - 120 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am by CMS
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am by CMS
The appeal was heard on 8 February 2021 before Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
   In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
. * The standout emoji law opinion of 2020 is Burrows v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The first is Secretary of State for Health and Ors v Servier Laboratories and Ors. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, Lord Hamblen, and Lord Burrows. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
As will be seen, the minority (Lords Burrows and Sales) regarded there to have been a choice of applicable law for the contract to be arbitrated and proceeded from this to determine the applicable law of the arbitration agreement. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
  The question whether mere consequential loss satisfies the tort gateway had been considered before by the Supreme Court in the very same case: Brownlie v Four Seasons [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 2 All ER 91 (“Brownlie I”). [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
David Lopez, I bring you the EEOC’s important Amicus Brief filed in Burrows v. [read post]