Search for: "Com. v. Held, J." Results 101 - 120 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 4:27 am
[This is a pity, says Merpel, who never tires of reading L'Oréal (UK) Ltd & Another v Johnson & Johnson & Another [2000] EWHC Ch 129 in which Mr Justice "Lightning" Lightman held a relatively amicable solicitor's letter to be a threat. [read post]
But the Supreme Court and many others have held that profit motive is not enough. [13] Moreover, the motivation behind Virgin Mobile’s Buzzfeed example may be less about the bottom line and more about building customer goodwill.[14] “Native content” as defined above is not an advertisement, does not refer to a specific product or service, and may not be solely motivated by economic factors. [read post]
”[37] With respect to the first two mailings promoting the sale of products, the Court held that these easily fell “within the core notion of commercial speech—speech which does no more than [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
J McEachern, D2007-1597 (WIPO February 9, 2008) (Pending action in Massachusetts state court) and Jason Crouch and Virginia McNeill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
J McEachern, D2007-1597 (WIPO February 9, 2008) (Pending action in Massachusetts state court) and Jason Crouch and Virginia McNeill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am by Gmlevine
J McEachern, D2007-1597 (WIPO February 9, 2008) (Pending action in Massachusetts state court) and Jason Crouch and Virginia McNeill v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2003) (Lourie, J., dissenting from denial of petition for rehearing en banc). [read post]