Search for: "Does 1 to 50 Inclusive "
Results 101 - 120
of 771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2019, 9:05 pm
. $10.4 million [1]. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm
§ 826.10, emphasis added) Emergency Paid Sick Leave (“EPSL”) does not apply where the employer does not have work for the employee: “An employee subject to one of these orders may not take paid sick leave where the employer does not have work for the employee. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:06 am
On July 1, 2019, the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from March 10 – April 13, 2022 inclusive. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
This statement, however, does not necessarily imply that the final desired coating thickness on both sides must be different. [1.1.7] Claim 1 of the main request is therefore not allowable. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:15 pm
This means that, on a monthly basis, an employer must take the following steps to determine whether 50 full-time employees are employed: 1) Determine the number “full-time” employees. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from March 15 – May 15, 2024 inclusive. [read post]
17 May 2012, 1:04 pm
A standard does two things. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
, plaintiffs claimed that their employer’s reduction in force unlawfully targeted workers over 50 years of age. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:00 am
What is stated in 1 para 3 item does not apply when the County Administrative Board has decided that the parent shall no longer be registered in the electoral rolls because the parent is not a Sami person. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:42 am
Modification of Maintenance Orders Entered Before 1/1/19 (750 ILCS 5/504(b-1)(1)(B)) and (750 ILCS 5/504(b-4)) Modification of maintenance orders entered prior to 1/1/19 that are and continue to be eligible for inclusion in the gross income of the payee for federal income tax purposes and deductible by the payor shall be calculated by taking: 30% of the payor’s gross annual income minus 20% of the payee’s gross annual… [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:30 am
The inclusion of pregnancy makes this much more complicated. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
Appellant’s Br. 43; see id. at49–50. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:13 am
Rul. 68-145, 1968-1 CB 203. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Idaho 1/1/19 FAGI FTI Illinois Rolling FTI FTI Indiana 1/1/19 FAGI FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:44 am
Truth on the Market also invites academics, practitioners, and other antitrust/regulation commentators to send us 1,500-4,000 word responses for potential inclusion in the symposium.] [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
Also developing a reading list/canon, which is particularly useful for design where there are a lot of different fields involved/don’t need to jump straight to legal doctrine.Session 1: What is “Design”? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
However, the majority judgment does not provide an explanation as to why the difference between pursuing inclusivity in higher education and implementing the right to primary education should make such a qualitative difference to the content of the right protected under Article 19(1)(g).However, this issue raises a fascinating question about the role of legislative intent in constitutional adjudication. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
Does this mean, as ruled in the Physical Research Laboratory v K.G. [read post]