Search for: "Does I through Doe III"
Results 101 - 120
of 6,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 4:31 pm
Schedule difficulty beyond Division I-A FBS does not show a linear decrease - it is more than that. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:00 am
KATYAL: Yes, I can. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
Impeachment does not implicate federalism, and it is an inherently political process, as the Founders well understood. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
The appellant requested thatthe appealed decision be set aside andthat the case be remitted to the examining division either with an order to grant a European patent on the basis of one of the main or auxiliary requests I to V and a description to be adapted,or for further examination.The main request and auxiliary requests I to III correspond to the requests of the contested decision, auxiliary requests IV and V were filed with the notice of appeal.III. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:30 am
Both the antebellum Congress and Supreme Court concluded that Congress enjoyed considerable discretion over the resolution of these claims, including through binding and preclusive decisions by non-Article III tribunals. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:13 am
But heads up, because that does not apply to §§1.2105(a)(2)(xii) and (c)(6); 1.2204(a), (c), (d)(3), and (d)(5); 1.2205(c) and (d); 1.2209; 2.1033(c)(19)(iii); 15.713(b)(2)(iv); 15.713(h)(10); 27.14(k) and (t)(6); 27.17(c); 27.19(b) and (c); 73.3700(b)(1)(i) through (v), (b)(2)(i) and (ii), (b)(3), (b)(4)(i) and (ii), and (b)(5); 73.3700(c); 73.3700(d); 73.3700(e)(2) through (6); 73.3700(f); 73.3700(g); 73.3700(h)(4) and (6);… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm
I'll provide commentary along the way. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
Does the New York Constitution? [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
The DOL was assigned as a Class III priority, and it was believed that Class III claims would not be paid because of insufficient funds. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
That’s Title I of the ADA. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:20 pm
This is Part III of our series of blog posts on the New Proposed Regulations. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
Notably, FISA does not require the full slate of protections that the Fourth Amendment demands in non-foreign intelligence cases, nor does it impose the more robust restrictions and obligations contained in the Wiretap Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 7:24 am
Weingarten's column made me think of Bob Dylan's "Talking World War III Blues":I was feelin’ kinda lonesome and blue I needed somebody to talk to So I called up the operator of time Just to hear a voice of some kind “When you hear the beep it will be three o’clock” She said that for over an hour And I hung upI love this old clip... and notice the variation on the lyrics just before… [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
In the comments James Grimmelmann predicts the case "may well enter the copyright teaching canon: it does a good job walking through the core issues of originality, filtration of uncopyrightable elements, and similarity of expression." [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:53 am
These paths in a patchwork will show that these emerging countries’ selective and negotiated participation in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) reveals a strategic will to preserve a normative autonomy to serve the needs of development (I), normative autonomy, which is also found in the approach of an international investment law that is regarded with a certain critical distance (II) and is illustrated in a variety of concrete trade and investment situations (III). [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 6:45 pm
Section I sketches the multiple tasks of ICs, in complex interdependence with other actors. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
About a month ago, I did part III of this series. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 12:21 pm
Circuit decision in al-Nashiri will convice the CMCR that it actually does have the authority to entertain applications for extraordinary relief under the All Writs Act (I'm not optimistic). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 12:15 pm
Does the principle apply in the crowdfunding context? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:43 am
Through our virtual law firm, you (i) purchase the SAME Georgia Advanced Directive for Health Care for $35.00 through our secure online service, (ii) at your convenience, complete a questionnaire, (iii) in 1 to 2 business days, our attorneys review and finalize your document and upload it onto your secure dashboard, and (iv) you print out your document and sign it at your convenience. [read post]
