Search for: "Fisher v. Williams" Results 101 - 120 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am by Anna Christensen
  In the first, Herman Obermayer profiles his late friend William H. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
In part, the amici correctly identified the experimental milieu in which Fisher worked, but the description of Fisher’s work is neither accurate nor fair. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:24 pm by Schachtman
To date, I have not addressed Ziliak and McCloskey’s book-length treatment of statistical significance, and their demonization of Sir Ronald Fisher, their beatification of William Gossett, and the need for a measure of “ummph: The Cult of Statistical Significance. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
” She also wants to know whether the opinion of the three-judge appeals panel conflicts with Parker v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am by Conor McEvily
  And at the New Yorker’s Daily Comment blog, Jeffrey Toobin discusses Fisher v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” NPR’s Nina Totenberg also reports on last Thursday’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is a relationship which is not sporadic but developing and involves a continuity of the professional services from which the alleged malpractice stems” (Frenchman v Queller, Fisher, Dienst, Serrins, Washor & Kool, LLP, 24 Misc 3d 486, 498 [Sup Ct New York Cnty 2009], quoting Muller v Sturman, 79 AD2d 482, 486 [4th Dept 1981]; see Henry v Leeds & Morelli, 4 AD3d 229 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]