Search for: "GEORGIA PACIFIC CO."
Results 101 - 120
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
The CAFC cited Georgia-Pacific:To support his royalty calculation, Wagner adjusted the baseline royalty rate of ($96) using the factors set out in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:00 am
Phoenix AZ $129,483 California Primary Care Association Sacramento CA $270,195 Assn Of Asian/Pacific Comm Heallth Organizations Oakland CA $46,000 Health Outreach Partners Oakland CA $106,687 National Conference Of State Legislatures Denver CO $55,017 National Network For Oral Health Access Denver CO $92,000 Community Health Association Of Mountain/Plains States Denver CO $75,000 Colorado Community Health Network Denver … [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
How the Corporate Backlash to Georgia’s New Voting Law is Shaping Other Fights Around the Country Over Access to the Polls MSN – Amy Gardner and Mike DeBonis (Washington Post) | Published: 4/11/2021 The conflagration in Georgia has spread into other states such as Texas, Florida, Michigan, and Arizona, where both business interests and voting rights activists buoyed by newfound momentum are rethinking how to challenge Republican-backed voting measures. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co. 19-949Issue: Whether a state violates Subsection (b)(4) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 by exempting intangible personal property of non-railroads from its personal property tax, but not exempting such property for a limited group of taxpayers that includes railroads. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
Reasonable royalty analysis (Georgia-Pacific factors) Lucent v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
The decision also decides the case of Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
Apple basically says that those carrier agreements might be relevant in connection with damages over non-standard-essential patents, but have no bearing on a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalty, a context in which standard patent damages rules can only be applied with certain modifications of the Georgia-Pacific factors (this post continues below the document): 15-11-06 Apple Letter Re. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 8:03 am
The event will feature remarks from Carl Walker, visiting scholar at the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center at Stanford University. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
Lorena Weeks of Georgia used Title VII to get promoted from telephone operator to switchman at Southern Bell, while Leah Rosenfeld of California used it to ascend to a job as a station agent with the Southern Pacific Railroad. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 10:25 am
Georgia-Pacific LLC, 2013 WL 2435565, 2013 NY Slip Op 04127 (June 6, 2013). [1] See, e.g., Simmons v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:16 am
Georgia-Pacific LLC, 2013 WL 2435565, 2013 NY Slip Op 04127 (June 6, 2013), aff’d, 2013 WL 2435565 (N.Y. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:45 am
Georgia-Pacific LLC, --- F. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
Co., 109 Cal. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am
Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Georgia-Pacific West v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 12:47 pm
Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Zumbiel Co. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Zumbiel Co. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The royalty amount assumes that the party would still be able to make a reasonable profit by selling the article in the open market.[5] Generally, the determination of a reasonable royalty for accused patent infringement applies the well-established factors set forth in Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
