Search for: "High v. Parker"
Results 101 - 120
of 432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am
The family was described and close-knit, caring and devoted. $20,000 each Campbell J refers to this award as “the high end of the conventional range of family law awards” (at para 309). [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 pm
See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
The case is Parker v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 9:32 am
Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Karen Parker reported the Miss Alberta took on water quickly in the lower compartments. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
The Texas Supreme Court, for example, has a pending case, Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:47 pm
Cir. 2002); see also Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:33 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:27 am
V. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
Mellon and Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
Today, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
Parker, 425 F.3d 250, 268 (6th Cir. 2005) (Martin, J., dissenting). [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(C) Abuse of the drug may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
" The 2-1 ruling came Friday in Parker, et al., v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
As early as 1983, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) noted that there was a high rate of hospital emergency room misuse by Medicaid recipients who would utilize high-cost emergency rooms for the care and treatment of non-emergency medical issues. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
At the same time, the Court will consider a cross-appeal, Parker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:11 pm
Parker, 249 S.W.3d at 398. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:57 am
The Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Park) disagrees. [read post]
9 May 2007, 6:38 pm
Circuit's decision yesterday not to revisit its earlier decision in Parker v. [read post]