Search for: "Hill v. Texas Government"
Results 101 - 120
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2021, 10:17 am
Capitol Hill Although President Trump criticized the final $900 billion COVID-relief legislative package (containing both COVID-relief and an omnibus spending bill that averted a government shutdown) for providing too little financial relief to Americans and too much wasteful spending, on December 27 he signed the package into law. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
The SG’s Empty Ethics Case Against Jane Doe’s LawyersA few days ago, Solicitor-General Noel Francisco submitted a Reply Brief for Petitioners in Hargan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
He first came into the public eye in October 1991, when Anita Hill accused him of sexual harassment. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm
[ABC News] * The Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm
[ABC News] * The Marbury v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
The government’s brief in Hill agrees that the Court should grant cert. in the case. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Perez, two complex redistricting cases from Texas, and Animal Science Products v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am
” At Law360 (subscription or registration required), Jason Steed discusses the Court’s recent decision in Harris v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
” Other commentary comes from Pratheepan Gulasekaram and Letitia Saucedo at ACSblog, and from Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 11:18 am
In Hill v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
McGraw-Hill Cos., 2007 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
United States, 11-5323, another in the group of petitions discussed last week that the Court is collecting for the November 22 Conference along with Hill v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
” At Governing, Jed Pressgrove outlines the dual impact of the court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
Texas, a 2017 decision by the Supreme Court rejecting a Texas court’s standards for determining whether an inmate is intellectually disabled. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:37 am
United States District Court for the WesternDistrict of Texas, 134 S. [read post]
