Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Etc" Results 101 - 120 of 183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
Most criminal cases before the courts do not involve the same concerns, or at least not to the same degree, as those of a high profile nature. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
 Whether there's effective appellate review surely affects the irreparable harm inquiry. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Should we be concerned about lack of oversight and public accountability? [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Could still have separate inquiry into whether warrant was required. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation (Keller v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
It does a great job demonstrating that the interplay between the First Amendment and the publicity rights is completely anarchy, which isn't surprising given that we don't really understand what we're trying to accomplish with the publicity rights doctrines in the first place. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm by Larry Catá Backer
The City University of Hong Kong's Centre for Comparative and Chinese Law hosted an International Conference on “The Rule of Law With Chinese Characteristics in Transition” held 5-7 June 2013 at the Connie Fan Multi-Media Conference Room, 4/F Chen Yick-Chi Building on the campus of CUHK. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:57 am by Florian Mueller
 Pinkert has previously advocated "more searching inquiry" of public-interest considerations. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Chief Judge Rader and Judge Moore, applying the approach from the collective opinion, held the method and product claims not to be directed to patentable subject matter, agreeing with Judge Lourie in the result, though for different reasons. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am by Schachtman
  This was not a credibility issue concerning Dr. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 6:13 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Whether a particular employer policy would "reasonably tend to chill employees" in their exercise of their Section 7 rights is judged objectively by whether it is likely to have a chilling effect on Section 7 rights, even if the employer has never even enforced the policy. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
publication=10151 … An excellent analysis from Debbie Dandeneau: 11th Circuit Upholds Bankruptcy Ct’s Fraudulent Transfer Ruling in TOUSA: http://bit.ly/JNWUqz Here's the 11th Circuit's Tousa opinion: http://react.bracewellgiuliani.com/reaction/documents/BasisPointsTousa11thCircuitOpinion.pdf … BK Judge John Olsen, the 1st Tousa judge, must feel VERY vindicated today. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:12 pm
  It's not just that there is an accuracy concern. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
I don’t think there’s anything particularly odd about that when you’re facing such an issue. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:10 am by charlesakrugel
In case you’re wondering about specific inquiries concerning arrests, the EEOC doesn’t bar this, but because many states & local governments ban arrest inquiries, I don’t advise arrest record screening. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
 [2011 (9) SCALE 287], wherein three learned Judges of this Court were called upon to consider as to whether the District Forum and the State Commission as established under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, had the power to recall an ex parte order. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Bags, t-shirts, etc. are targets. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Boundary concerns have always been with us in IP. [read post]