Search for: "In Re Morales" Results 101 - 120 of 11,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2020, 1:25 pm by Howard Bashman
“Why Trump Needs Bill Barr: We’re one attorney-general resignation away from establishing moralized hysteria as a normal tool of U.S. politics. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm by David Fagundes
  Some soccer cultures regard simulation as the sporting equivalent of murder (morally reprehensible regardless of whether you’re caught doing it), while others regard it as the sporting equivalent of jaywalking (illegal, and not a good idea, but something you might do every so often if you think you can get away with it and it gains you some advantage). [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 4:16 am by SHG
You don’t care if you destroy a witness’ reputation or career by admittedly misrepresenting and distorting the truth”), when that’s precisely the use to which Feldman puts his flavor of morality to empower people to believe they’re entitled to ignore law whenever it fails to meet with their personal moral approval. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:21 am by Guy Burgess
In short, the two groups have clashing conceptions of moral value.In many cases, culture has a powerful influence on the moral order. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
It’s no big moral deal; which doesn’t mean, I hasten to add, that plagiarism shouldn’t be punished — if you’re in our house, you’ve got to play by our rules — just that what you’re punishing is a breach of disciplinary decorum, not a breach of the moral universe. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:45 am by SHG
  After all, if they’re all in jail, they can’t rape and pillage. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:11 pm
It was probably the correct legal decision, though not the correct moral one.I'm posting to share this link: Today, Ted Olson and David Boies filed a federal equal protection claim challenging the validity of Proposition 8. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
It’s true if we’re talking about personal autonomy to, for instance, choose a religion, or decide which relatives to love; my sense is that even most Americans who thinks there’s a fixed moral duty not to worship graven idols or to honor one’s father or mother would think that the law should not enforce those duties, largely because of a respect for personal autonomy. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 8:04 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
Does the master of the Kremlin, who openly aspires to re-create the Soviet empire, have “legitimate security needs” that require tending? [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 6:02 pm
Westendorp v the Queen (1983) Reference Re Nova Scotia Board of Censors v McNeil (1978) Rio Hotel Ltd v New Brunswick (Liquor licensing board) (1987) Switzman v Elbling (1957) Bedard v Dawson (1923) Reference re Alberta Legislation (1938), aka Alberta Press Act Reference Download Standard Podcast [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Ignacio de la Rasilla del Moral, Brunel University London, has published In the Shadow of Vitoria: A History of International Law in Spain (1770-1953) with Brill. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm by Amy Howe
She asked Mongan whether California could “pass a law that said we’re not going to buy any pork from companies that don’t require all their employees to be vaccinated or from corporations that don’t fund gender-affirming surgeries. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:51 pm
 Any Constitution that would sanction murder has no moral authority. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:56 pm
Perhaps the real moral hazard problem in medicine is the moral hazard of the providers (chiefly doctors and hospitals). [read post]