Search for: "In re Ballot Title #3"
Results 101 - 120
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2014, 11:02 pm
The Ds and Rs might think they're all liars. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm
” Aaanndd… that’s where the title for the blog post comes in. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has approved the ballot language by a vote of 4 to 3. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:48 pm
XI, sec. 3, Fla. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:08 am
The case is In re: People United for Medical Marijuana (SC13-2006). [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
Trade Union Law imposed criminal and administrative law liability on companies who prevent the operation of labor union. 3. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:41 am
In that address titled Securing Our Futures, I outlined the State of Indian Nations once again, as we’ve done every year for almost 11 years. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
On the 2012 Roundtable, see, Paper Delivered at the 2012 Penn State Law and Semiotics Roundtable: The Corporation as Semiosis, “Citizens United,” the Signification of the Corporate Enterprise and the Development of Law Law at the End of the Day, March 3, 2012; on the 2011 Roundtable see Larry Catá Backer, The 2011 Kevelson Workshop on Law and Semiotics at Penn State--Outstanding Student Presentations, Law at the End of the Day, April 11, 2011.This year,… [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 11:47 am
In other words, it is too easy to get these kinds of measures on the ballot in California.3) I am looking forward to the First Amendment fight over this new law. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 5:30 am
Robin Shea asked: We already have Title VII and the Equal Pay Act, both of which give remedies to women if they're discriminated against with respect to compensation, as well as your own Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
Apparently circuit court judges' rulings on ballot titles can't be appealed, and so the measure will go up for a vote in November under the dubious label of an "income tax. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
The first two claims in the suit allege that the Ballot Label and Ballot Title and Summary for Prop 33 are not true and impartial statements as to the purposes of Prop 33 and they are highly likely to create prejudice against the measure. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
FINAL UPDATE at 3:14 p.m. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
However, on appeal by the State, the Supreme Court ordered his re-arrest and upheld the validity of his original conviction. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
I like not deciding until I mark the ballot. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
Res. 103; S.J. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
In its judgment in In Re Marriage Cases in May of 2008, the Court agreed. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm
In its judgment in In Re Marriage Cases in May of 2008, the Court agreed. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:02 am
The final ballot measure read as follows: This measure amends the State Constitution. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
"He*l, they're all disgruntled. [read post]
