Search for: "In re Michael S. (1983)" Results 101 - 120 of 253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm by Law Lady
Plaintiff subsequently filed suit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant, a police detective, alleging the deliberate fabrication of evidence. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
Several bacteria, including E. coli, induce septic arthritis.[59] The resulting joint pain and inflammation can resolve completely over time or permanent joint damage can occur.[60] The reactive arthritis associated with Reiter’s may develop after a person eats food that has been tainted with bacteria. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:29 am by Don Cruse
Discovery of medical peer-review committee records related to a doctor's claim of unfair competition IN RE MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM; MEMORIAL HERMANN PHYSICIAN NETWORK; MICHAEL MACRIS, M.D.; MICHAEL MACRIS, M.D., P.A.; AND KEITH ALEXANDER, No. 14-0171 Opinion of the Court In this suit, a surgeon who specialized in robotic heart surgery alleges that his former hospital destroyed his professional reputation and dried up… [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:27 am by Michael Froomkin
So Froomkin’s answer to Post’s question was to note that being “in the room” matters. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
§ 1983 in their complaint. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 12:16 am by Helene L. Taylor, Esq.
 Dave Matthews When you’re getting divorced it’s so easy to be frazzled-fried by Friday night. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:18 pm by David Kravets
Eyes popped at the staggering $500,000 cost to produce Michael Jackson's nearly 14-minute-long "Thriller" video in 1983. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:34 am by SHG
McCauley, Brad Alford, Michael B. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
In Wednesday’s post, I discussed how many of these roadblocks fall away if you’re in a private prison. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
The Clause’s Purpose Supports the “Arise” Interpretation The Clause’s purpose, in the context of the Appointments Clause as a whole, confirms the most natural reading of the text. [read post]