Search for: "Keene v. Keene"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 12:17 pm
In a matter of keen interest to the small business community, last month the Supreme Court, granted certiorari in Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 11:48 am
(See Sexton v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
But in Worthy v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 12:54 pm
Justice Pat Fischer, quoting longtime Cincinnati Reds radio announcer Marty Brennaman On November 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Cincinnati Reds, L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:30 am
However, in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:47 pm
Not everyone is keen on vaccines though, and those divisions extend to disputes between parents over their kids. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am
Keen reports that two federal appeals courts recently applied Bostock v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
The question arose as Justice Chelameswar was keen to know how the Court can conclude that there is no possibility of reformation of the convict. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
’” (Cohen v Cohen [N.Y. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Keen QC replied “yes”. 12:43 Lord Keen QC states it is clear in the relevant legislation that Parliament is sovereign. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:31 am
Wolff’s keen dissent (to which Teitleman joined) in Kansas City Premier Apartments, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:35 pm
With oral argument scheduled for Monday in Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:01 am
In Kata v Westminster CC [2011] EWCA Civ 1456 and Simpson-Lowe v Croydon BC [2012] EWCA Civ 131 (neither are on baili or westlaw, but are on Lexis; Kata is noted in February's Legal Action at p 13), permissions to appeal not vulnerable s 202 homelessness reviews, upheld by the county court, were refused by the CA. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:01 am
In Kata v Westminster CC [2011] EWCA Civ 1456 and Simpson-Lowe v Croydon BC [2012] EWCA Civ 131 (neither are on baili or westlaw, but are on Lexis; Kata is noted in February's Legal Action at p 13), permissions to appeal not vulnerable s 202 homelessness reviews, upheld by the county court, were refused by the CA. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
In Actavis v Lilly, Lord Neuberger was keen to follow Germany, which was subsequently watered down in Warner Lambert and, now, more so. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 6:49 pm
For example, this is how the votes appear in Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Although the case is not a class action, the opinion is of keen interest because this is the California Supreme Court's first consideration of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:18 am
., et al. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:38 pm
Especially in this case, which I briefly discussed here.That said, (1) I'm not at all surprised that this one got taken en banc today-- it's an important (and close) issue, and (2) I have a keen sense that you'll see these same arguments -- and, assuming an appropriate draw, perhaps virtually the same opinions -- reappear after the en banc process concludes.Stay tuned. [read post]
