Search for: "MATTER OF T S D" Results 101 - 120 of 34,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 10:21 am by Goldberg Jones
” Rick: “Well, what’s interesting about this is that it probably doesn’t matter. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
   At some level, it really doesn’t matter whether you prefer my three question approach or a long questionnaire. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
They don’t have the right to a blank check. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:36 pm
I think we'd all agree that placing a kid in a foster home that would require the kid to be in a car ten hours a week in order to visit his natural parent(s) -- which is part of the unification plan here -- doesn't satisfy a statutory requirement that dictates that the child be placed in "reasonable proximity" to his parents. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 8:07 am by Lindsay Griffiths
  Relationships Matter...But not if We Can't Afford Them LinkedIn's message is that "relationships matter. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:39 am by Aaron Moss
Kat Von Ds Instagram postIn March, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment: Sedlik sought a ruling that his copyright had been infringed as a matter of law, while Von D (along with defendants KVD, Inc. and High Voltage Tattoo) asked the court to determine that the use of Sedlik’s photo as a reference image qualified as a fair use of the copyrighted work. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 7:35 am
And since the ads are not targeted to other lawyers, it shouldn’t matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm by Stephen Halbrook
" And even if it were 30 it wouldn't matter: the question under Heller is whether the banned magazines are in common use today, not 100 years ago. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:44 am by Dan Bressler
“Lawyer Likely Can’t Defend Clients on Related Criminal Charges” — “A New York lawyer representing two clients in separate but related criminal matters faces a ‘likely unwaivable’ conflict of interest based on the facts presented, a recent state bar association opinion said. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:28 am by Charles Rothfeld
The post Symposium: What’s the harm in a T-shirt? [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
Toll’s comments certainly don’t evince any awareness of a cramdown effect. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:05 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The court goes on and says that it doesn’t matter whether or not the provision is an exclusion or a condition, because either way, the provision narrows coverage, and therefore it must be interpreted based on principles applicable to the interpretation of exclusions. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:07 am by Bill
"So long, J-E-T-S Jets! [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The reasons for this were, in particular, that the subject-matter disclosed on page 9, line 23 to page 10, line 18, was "broader than the subject-matter of the allowable claim [sic] claim 17 which concerns the expression vector of the invention" and "[i]t cannot be interpreted that this passage concerns an embodiment which would be a dependent claim of claim 17". [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
I thought I’d ask again what I brought up a few years: How can the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy — or for that matter, any similar exclusion policy — be justified as to lesbians? [read post]