Search for: "Major Mills v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 11:32 am
Here’s the Third Circuit’s merits opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 12:44 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 9:59 am
In Herrera v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Dulaney v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
”When Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:10 pm
Mills (Ga. 1944). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm
Fulton v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:59 am
The United States District Court’s holding in Gibbs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
The officer stated as he arrested the protesters that he was arresting them for violation of the tent ordinance. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Netzsch-Feinmahltechnik GmbH, Serial No. 79100238 (March 25, 2014) [not precedential].We know from Wal-Mart v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices express skepticism over using legislative motive in pre-emption analysis
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
A majority of the justices seemed unwilling to open that Pandora’s box. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Circuit held in Halbig v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:23 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority in Sandifer v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
" He also states that a "striking legacy of Youngstown is that it was not Justice Black’s majority opinion that has had the most influence but Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Mills and Dr. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Mills v Sweeney, 219 NY 213, decided in 1916, the Appellate Division explained that any local law that "[a]bolishes an elective office" or "reduces the salary of an elective officer during his [or her] term of office" is subject to the approval of a mandatory referendum. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Recently, plans to build a corn milling plant in North Dakota have caused states governments to consider their role in protecting both state and national security. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
