Search for: "Martin by and Through Martin v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 884
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
Second is Martin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:16 pm
Lockheed Martin et al., 1:09 cv 324 HSO (JMR), in the Southern District of Mississippi, alleging that defendants knowingly submitted, or caused to be submitted, false claims to the United States through their bid-rigging activities designed to procure the task order. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm by Margaret Wood
”  In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:56 pm by Shea Denning
This type of per se exception to the warrant requirement was rejected by the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:12 pm by Mark Edwards
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), is an fascinating decision. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am by Daniel Martin
Kane Jr. of United States District Court in Denver, who believes that prosecutors have grown more powerful than judges. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
He is a United Kingdom citizen and non- immigrant alien, living in the United States pursuant to a valid E-2 Visa, who at all relevant times has been residing in Sonoma, California. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:53 am by jeff
Martin, began divorce and child custody proceedings against her husband, Richard London, also a United States citizen, in St. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am by Andrew Mark Bennett
As Vladeck explains in his Note, citing Martin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
Attorney’s Office in D.C on May 24th, it was revealed that the individuals in question were charged with “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States” and causing injury to museum property in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Sections 6303(b)(2): Touching of, or Injuries to, Property. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am by Legal Beagle
As a party litigant without representation, Mr Wilson was, according to court observers, forced abroad to Japan and the United States for supportive expert medical reports. [read post]