Search for: "Matter of Barnette" Results 101 - 120 of 996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
That is the precise reason why originalist scholars like Solum, Randy Barnett, and most New Originalists argue that known expected applications are not binding if "beliefs about facts" change. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm by Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery
(Our colleague responded that what matters is the principle, not the technology available at any one time). [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
This disclosure was a serious matter on its own terms, but it also suggested a major conflict-of-interest. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm by Randy Barnett
Barnett is the Patrick Hotung professor of constitutional law at the Georgetown University Law Center and the faculty director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
My “contextualist” study of all relevant eighteenth-century linguistic and legal sources revealed the ICC’s original meaning to ordinary readers, its drafters’ intent, and its ratifiers’ understanding.[15]First, Congress could regulate “commerce” – the voluntary sale of goods and services and accompanying activities intended for the market – but not purely cultural, moral, and social matters.[16]Second, such “commerce” had to… [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:09 am by Christopher J. Walker
After all, as Kent Barnett and I documented in our study of Chevron deference in the circuit courts, there may be “a Chevron Supreme” and “a Chevron Regular. [read post]
Do any of the differences between the way Brown, Parrish, and Barnett overruled precedent and the way you’ll do it matter? [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:33 pm by NARF
Barnett (Voting Rights - Registration; National Voter Registration Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html State of Montana v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
What all of that means is that this form of originalism (without super-strong deference) is indistinguishable from living constitutionalism, or for that matter common good constitutionalism. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:00 pm by Stephen Page
It became a central election pledge of then incoming Premier Colin Barnett. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:00 pm by Stephen Page
It became a central election pledge of then incoming Premier Colin Barnett. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
Randy Barnett and the Commerce Clause Koppelman takes aim a [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:15 am by Lawrence Solum
On the one hand, Justice Thomas and scholars such as Richard Epstein and Randy Barnett have contended that the Supreme Court from 1836–1936 correctly interpreted the CC as authorizing Congress to regulate as “commerce” only the sale or transportation of goods. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
It is the competitive process, not the fortunes of particular competitors, that matters. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
 Similarly, the originalist methodologies favored by Professor Randy Barnett, with a fairly large "construction zone" informed by Barnett's libertarian values, provide judges enormous flexibility to inject their own values into the law. [read post]