Search for: "Miller v. Bear"
Results 101 - 120
of 630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
Russell Miller and William Starshak hold that China violated the no-harm principle by not establishing sufficient standards concerning its health and food regulations, allowing for potentially hazardous sanitary conditions at the country’s wet markets. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am
This difference is noteworthy because it bears on the history of Jewish Americans’ pursuit of full political rights. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Aynes, “Bradwell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
After viability, the state can restrict abortion entirely as long as it maintains an exception to preserve the life or health of the mother.Although the Supreme Court has decided many important abortion rights cases, the third that bears mentioning here is Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
By Dean Cazenave, Blane Clark and Elisabeth Prescott Keenly aware of the enormous impact COVID-19 is having on small businesses throughout the country, in response, the Congress approved and on March 27, 2020, the President signed the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act” (the “CARES Act”). [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
Supreme Court upheld male-only registration in Rostker v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 6:12 am
Attorney Christopher Clark scoffed at the idea that Ahmed sought as little as five years in prison while citing his devotion to his son as a basis for leniency, highlighting that he was “providing heroin to his girlfriend who was bearing his son. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 7:20 pm
The most famous case of this type is the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
Miller, 307 U.S. 174, 179 (1939)). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
The EPC has no explicit provision preventing double patenting by the same applicant of the same invention; not by two applications filed on the same date but not connected via priority or otherwise, not by two applications filed on different dates but linked by priority (so having the same effective date but different filing date), not by by two applications filed on different dates but with the same filing date (i.e., a parent and a divisional). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
It noted that as the Fourth Circuit stated in Miller v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Policy As part of our policy efforts (discussed in greater detail here) we have intervened jointly with the Federation of Law Societies of Canada before the Supreme Court in the Keatley v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm
Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853, which quoted Lewis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:53 pm
The argument is similar to that raised Singh v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am
Miller of Duke Law School, they filed an amicus brief in support of neither side in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm
MILLER,FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1083 (4th ed. 2019)(noting that “[t]he general attitude of the federal courts isthat the provisions of Federal Rule 4 should be liberallyconstrued”); King v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
The court of appeals vacated the sentence, concluding that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by focusing on the nature of the offense and not whether the defendant was, within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
” (Last quoting Jensen v. [read post]
