Search for: "Norris v. Norris" Results 101 - 120 of 555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 6:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But Section 1983 claims have their pitfalls, as demonstrated in this case.The case is Naumovski v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am by Rosalind English
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Stewart pointed out that the mailbox rule applied to the final step in a workers' comp appeal -- the filing of a notice of appeal from the Circuit to the Appellate Court -- under Harrisburg-Raleigh, and to appeals from the arbitrator to the Commission under Norris v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:02 am
This Kat has been reviewing Amanda Michaels' (and Andrew Norris') book "A practical approach to Trade Mark Law". [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:10 pm by Danielle Arteaga
 The Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District, Division Three, recently published its decision in Gundogdu v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:32 am by Patricia Salkin
Because Norris Patrick was a taxpayer in Brookings County, he had standing under SDCL 11–2–61. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am by Joe Consumer
Norris is not happy about this. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
This morning the Court of Appeal (Jacob and Sedley LJJ and Norris J) handed down its judgment in Nokia v IPCom [2011] EWCA Civ 6.By way of back story: IPCom (described in the judgment as a “non practising entity”, i.e. a patentee with no business of its own in products covered by the patents), owned a number of patents (which it had bought from Bosch) in the field of mobile communications technology. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix Chambers.
Magistrates’ Court: the Legacy of Norris v USA (No 2) In reaching his decision, DJ Evans relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Norris v USA [2010] 2 AC 487, which concerned the extradition of a 66 year old man with poor health whose wife could not accompany him upon extradition due to her ill health. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:20 am by Ted Frank
The Supreme Court already addressed this issue in Brown v. [read post]