Search for: "P. v. Murray" Results 101 - 120 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 4:35 am by Broc Romanek
And I'm just loving the satirical campaign being waged by Murray Hill Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
The other news from Florida is that Sarah Murray of Murray & Associates is continuing to send demand letters claiming she represents Pursuit of Respect. [read post]
See, e.g., Murray Hill Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:41 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Ansari v Amini, heard 10-11 November 2020 (Julian Knowles J) Please let us know if there are other… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 28 June 2021 Murray J handed down judgment in the case of Watkins v Mackle [2021] EWHC 1723 (QB). [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved On Tuesday 27 April 201 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P,  Henderson and Warby LJJ) heard the appeal in case of Riley v Sivier. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments George  v Cannell, heard on 14 June 2022 (Underhill V-P, Warby and Snowden LLJ) The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspaper [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Murray Demolition Corp. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
A Message [pdf] published this week by the Lord Burnett of Maldon CJ, Sir Terence Etherton MR and Sir Andrew McFarlane P, outlines how the Circuit and District Judges sitting in Civil and Family should deal with remote working. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
That view has since been upheld by the Court of Appeal in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262, although the narrowness of this interpretation was queried (without ruling) by the same court in another privacy case, Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446. [read post]