Search for: "PARTY X (SEALED)" Results 101 - 120 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 5:57 am
App'x 78, 80 (2d Cir. 2008) ("On a motion for summary judgment, a district court must consider the evidence in the context of whether any reasonable finder of fact—not merely the district court itself—could return a verdict in favor of the non-moving party. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This article shall not affect such treaties as have previously been concluded by one of the contracting parties with other States. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE X Everything found in the possession of the fugitive criminal at the time of his arrest, whether being the proceeds of the crime or offence, or which may be material as evidence in making proof of the crime, shall, so far as practicable, according to the laws of either of the Contracting Parties, be delivered up with his person at the time of the surrender. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This Article shall not affect treaties which were already concluded by one of the Contracting Parties at a previous period with other States. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm by kira
It is analogous to telling people to vote for the lesser of two evils to ease them out of supporting a two-party political system. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under the stipulations of this Treaty. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE X If the individual claimed by one of the High contracting Parties, in pursuance of the present treaty, shall also be claimed by one or several other Powers on account of crimes or offences committed within their respective jurisdictions, his extradition shall be granted to the State whose demand is first received; Provided, That the Government from which extradition is asked is not bound by treaty, in case of concurrent demands, to give preference to the one earliest in… [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
If the party against whom the statement was admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party may examine the declarant on the statement as if on cross-examination. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE X Everything found in the possession of the fugitive criminal at the time of his arrest, whether being the proceeds of the crime or offense, or which may be material as evidence in making proof of the crime, shall so far as practicable according to the laws of either of the High Contracting Parties, be delivered up with his person at the time of surrender. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE X Everything found in the possession of the fugitive criminal at the time of his arrest, whether being the proceeds of the crime or offense, or which may be material as evidence in making proof of the crime, shall so far as practicable according to the laws of either of the High Contracting Parties, be delivered up with his person at the time of surrender. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE X If the individual claimed by one of the High contracting Parties, in pursuance of the present treaty, shall also be claimed by one or several other Powers on account of crimes or offences committed within their respective jurisdictions, his extradition shall be granted to the State whose demand is first received; Provided, That the Government from which extradition is asked is not bound by treaty, in case of concurrent demands, to give preference to the one earliest in… [read post]