Search for: "PEOPLE v. MYERS"
Results 101 - 120
of 495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Myers, J. in Arconti et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:28 am
Lucie Lodge 1189 Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Maine 2002); Sullivan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:52 am
Serving West Palm Beach, Miami, Tampa, Orlando and Fort Myers/ Naples. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm
In California v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 5:52 am
Most people don’t consider cars to be “tools,” but they were established as such by the Florida Supreme Court in the 1920 decision of Southern Cotton Oil v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Additional Resources: Ridley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
Additional Resources: Ridley v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:05 pm
Liebeck v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 10:41 am
Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983; Dixon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:27 am
Additional Resources: Rardin v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:27 am
Additional Resources: Rardin v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
” In the end, the majority’s revisionist history about three foundational cases of the administrative state—Myers v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
In his opinion, the Chief Justice explained that the President’s power to remove those who exercise his executive power on his behalf has its roots in Article II and was confirmed in the landmark decision Myers v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
The court does not have personal jurisdiction over any opt-in servers who did not work in Pennsylvania, the employer contended, citing the Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
