Search for: "PRECISION TECHNOLOGIES CORP" Results 101 - 120 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 8:28 am by Eric Guttag
But the fact that 9 technologically-challenged Justices reached a unanimous decision based on nonsensical, as well as logically and legally-flawed, reasoning does not impress me, or persuade me. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:36 am by LTA-Editor
Akamai Technologies, Inc., a unanimous Supreme Court clarified the standard for induced patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:24 am
Joanne Alexander, SVP, general counsel, and corporate secretary, Precision Drilling Corp. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:28 am by Ashby Jones
And it’s precisely that that’s stoked the interest of federal regulators, reports Catan. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 7:26 am
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988), the doctrine provides that a manufacturer of military equipment cannot be held liable for a state law design defect claim if “(1) the United States approved reasonably precise specifications; (2) the equipment conformed to those specifications; and (3) the supplier warned the United States about the dangers in the use of the equipment that were known to the supplier but not to the United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
See AK Steel Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
In Wi-Lan Technologies Corp. v. [read post]