Search for: "People of the State of California v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
In July 2023, PacWest had announced its plan to merge with the Bank of California. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
EFF had a welcome opportunity to direct attention toward the less-often discussed other potential uses of blockchains when we were invited to testify before the United States House Energy and Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Innovation, Data, and Commerce. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
The NTA alleged that Rodriguez (1) was not a citizen or national of the United States, (2) was a native and citizen of Mexico, (3) had entered the United States near Otay Mesa, California, on approximately September 27, 2010, and (4) had not been admitted or paroled after inspection by an immigration officer. . . . [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In 2010, in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
(I put that aside because I don’t think state-court judges that represent the people of a single state should be able to remove candidates for national office under a provision of the U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm
Traditionally, this begins with a survey of the people who retired and passed away, and a recap of new and closed programs. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
First, the court found that the state consumer protection law claims couldn’t cover the US because it wasn’t enough to allege that “substantially similar statutes” exist in all other states is insufficient, and they only cited California and Missouri consumer protection law in the complaint. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 10:30 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Over 90 percent of abortions in the United States occur in the first trimester of pregnancy (before 13 weeks). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
First, it included a choice of law clause (cl 1): ‘[A]ny and all disputes between Carrier and any Guest shall be governed exclusively and in every respect by the general maritime law of the United States without regard to its choice of law principles … To the extent such maritime law is not applicable, the laws of the State of California (U.S.A.) shall govern the contract, as well as any other claims or disputes arising out of that relationship. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Traction: We are adding about 25 people a day as registrants, having fully launched in late October 2023, and have begun demos with attorneys. [read post]
