Search for: "People v Case" Results 101 - 120 of 57,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The case emerged from complaints by Nebraskans that the state was improperly subjecting mental health patients to segregation from general society, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the 1999 US Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
Third, these documents make clear that the scheme was not—as now alleged by Trump’s defenders—a contingency plan in case courts overturned election results. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:59 am by Kenan Farrell
While most people are spending their time at the racetrack, Indiana IP litigators are still hard at work. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:00 am by Unknown
"Reports & journal articles:Border Walls and Refugees, Research Brief in Economic Policy, no. 381 (CATO Institute, May 2024) [text]The Externalities of Immigration Policies on Migration Flows: The Case of an Asylum Policy, IZA Discussion Paper, no. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The top two teams presented oral argument at the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute in the case of Moody v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
Sandrine Maljean-Dubois 35   European Union law at the time of climate crisis: change through continuity Emilie Chevalier  51    “Transnational” Climate Change Law A case for reimagining legal reasoning? [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 "The regular people I think are being disenfranchised sometimes by the way that we talk about cases. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Daniel E. Walters
The Supreme Court will soon decide, in the cases of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
The environmental climate change case that has attracted the most attention, Juliana v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am by Giles Peaker
It is about the rights of people who are not intentionally homeless, a frequently highly vulnerable group of people. [read post]