Search for: "People v Doe"
Results 101 - 120
of 35,663
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Nov 21, 2023 | Does Industry Self-Regulation of Mental Health Apps Protect Consumers? [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
BrazilBig Pan Bakery v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:16 pm
Carlisle v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
, Bradford v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:50 am
This case implicates both rules, but the New York Court of Appeals rules in favor of the driver.The case is People v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
Doe. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:05 pm
This past summer, in Counterman v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
" Ricci v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:26 am
In Lange v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
While "some overlap between the three separate branches does not violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers[,] . . . when [a branch] acts inconsistently with [the powers of another], or usurps its prerogatives, . . . the doctrine of separation is violated" (Clark v Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 189 [1985]).Defendant consists of 11 members who are nominated, subject to certain eligibility restrictions, by various members of the executive and legislative branches… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
While "some overlap between the three separate branches does not violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers[,] . . . when [a branch] acts inconsistently with [the powers of another], or usurps its prerogatives, . . . the doctrine of separation is violated" (Clark v Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 189 [1985]).Defendant consists of 11 members who are nominated, subject to certain eligibility restrictions, by various members of the executive and legislative branches… [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
" The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Regan v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:30 am
” The dissenting judge reasoned that the plan did not discriminate because “it does not draw a line between procedures transgender people need and procedures that other people need. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
What specific reference does Public Law have to this question? [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:49 am
” quoting Azar v. [read post]
